I was pretty psyched that my employer sent me out to Black Hat last week. It was nice to hang out with a bunch of people who are enthusiastic about discussing computer security issues.
I wish I could have spent the entire week at the conference. Maybe next year. I got a good taste for the issues at hand, but I found myself yearning for more technical content.
The marquee talk that was presented at Black Hat was given by Dan Kaminsky on the subject of DNS security. I didn't actually attend this talk because it was mobbed and I am already very familiar with this issue. Basically, the problem Kaminsky has brought to light has to do with the low-level details of how the DNS protocol works. A sufficiently skilled attacker can poison a DNS server using faults in how the DNS protocol is specified and implemented. Kaminsky presented a significant new attack in this space.
After having some time to reflect on this attack, I am struck by how similar Kaminsky's attack is to a previous attack -- the attack first documented by Morris and made famous by Mitnick (who attacked Shimomura). This style of attack has been well-understood for decades now. When you get down to it, if an attacker decides to attack a protocol that is protected with easily guessable sequence numbers (or else the attacker can flood the host that he/she wishes to attack), the security of the protocol will soon be compromised.
Look how far we (haven't) come...
Showing posts with label las vegas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label las vegas. Show all posts
11 August 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)